<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11133/91">
    <title>DSpace コレクション: 2001-03</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11133/91</link>
    <description>2001-03</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11133/2013" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11133/2014" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11133/2008" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11133/2009" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-25T03:13:41Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11133/2013">
    <title>文学作品にみられる身体について : 谷崎潤一郎の諸作品を手がかりとして</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11133/2013</link>
    <description>タイトル: 文学作品にみられる身体について : 谷崎潤一郎の諸作品を手がかりとして
著者: 山田, 岳志
抄録: The aim of this study is to make clear the literary image of body in relation to the social structure from the late Taisho era to the early Showa era. For this paper, the works of Junichiro Tanizaki examined here. Literary works have been thought to be a useful meams of as seeing of body. Literature makes it possible to analyse contemporary society more realistically than by social science, because it tends to show the time and society more vividly by its free imagination. To explain body through literature seems to be most suitable approach. For this point of view, the image of body appeared in literary work from the lateTaisho era to the early Showa era discussed in this paper, mainly concerning body treated in the wors of Junichiro Tanizaki.</description>
    <dc:date>2001-03-30T15:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11133/2014">
    <title>連続関数の平均値の近似公式とその誤差について</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11133/2014</link>
    <description>タイトル: 連続関数の平均値の近似公式とその誤差について
著者: 藤田, 康介; 樋口, 功
抄録: Let f(x) be continuous on the interval [a, b]. The mean value M(f) of f(x) on [a, b] is defined as follows : [numerical formula] where we denote by F(x) the primitive function of f(x). In the case when F(x) is unknown, we must calculate Ad (f) by the aid of so-called approximate formulas. In this paper, we shall obtain first an asymptotic expansion of the mean value M(f) with the terms of Riemann's quadrature by parts and next its end-points correction formula. We remark that the celebrated Euler-Maclaurin's summation formula is an immediate consequence of our asymptotic expansion just obtained. Further we shall derive some approximate formulas of mean value based on the function-values at random points.</description>
    <dc:date>2001-03-30T15:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11133/2008">
    <title>イエズス会日本コレジオの宇宙論講義(1)</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11133/2008</link>
    <description>タイトル: イエズス会日本コレジオの宇宙論講義(1)
著者: 森, ゆかり
抄録: Despite the severe persecution of the Christians by the Japanese government, the Jesuit missionary, Pedro Gomez(1535-1600) compiled the astronomy lectures entitled De sphaera (1593) to instruct the students at the Jesuit college in Japan. Back in Europe. Jesuit scholars were very productive in astronomical publications. One example was the commentary of Sacrobosco's De sphaera by Christopher Clavius (1537-1612) and another was the commentary of Aristotle's De coelo, by a group of Jesuit scholars at the University of Coimbra, Portugal. Coimbra was exactly the place where Gomez served as a lecturer for eight years before he left the country for his overseas missions. In this paper, I will compare the cosmologies of Gomez and of his contemporary Jesuits in terms of the following points. l) What is the shape of the Empyrean heaven, supposedly the outermost surface of the universe? 2) What causes the celestial motions? Gomez's De sphaera and the Coimbra commentary of De coelo shared some distinct characteristics in common, such as the cubic shape of the outer surface of the Empyrean heaven and the angelic intellect as the motive force of the celestial spheres. The rest of the comparisons are to follow in Part II of this essay.</description>
    <dc:date>2001-03-30T15:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11133/2009">
    <title>イエズス会日本コレジオの宇宙論講義(2)</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11133/2009</link>
    <description>タイトル: イエズス会日本コレジオの宇宙論講義(2)
著者: 森, ゆかり
抄録: Part II of this essay deals with the following points in comparison. 3) What is the cosmic structure like beyond the planet Saturn? 4) Is the celestial region corruptible or incorruptible? Is it solid or fluid? Where are comets and novas located in the celestial region? Both Gomez and Conimbricenses assigned a precession of the equinoxes to the eighth sphere and a trepidation to the ninth sphere in their overall eleven-sphere cosmology. In contrast, Clavius assigned a precession of the equinoxes to the eighth sphere and the Copernican two librations to the ninth and the tenth spheres in his twelve-sphere cosmology. While Calvius's De sphaera grappled with novas and comets that challenged the defenders of traditional views. Jesuit cosmologies taught both in Portugal and Japan can be characterized as Renaissance Aristotelianism yet to incorporate the new diseoveries made by Tycho Brahe and others. However, much of their astronomical information was unknown to the majority of the Japanese at that time and could have contributed tremendously if the religio-political situations had been otherwise.</description>
    <dc:date>2001-03-30T15:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

